Home / Gaming / The best gaming monitor 2019: Digital Foundry's favourites at every price point – Eurogamer.net

The best gaming monitor 2019: Digital Foundry's favourites at every price point – Eurogamer.net

Choosing the right gaming monitor can be tricky. While some PC peripherals like mice and keyboards are mostly matters of personal preference, some gaming monitors are just objectively better than others, offering higher resolutions, faster refresh rates or more accurate colours. Monitors can also last a long time – often five years or more – and you’ll probably use them every day, whether you’re playing games or trying to get some work done.

That makes it important to choose the right monitor, but the options for brands, specs and features can be overwhelming. That’s why we are keeping it simple, to give you the gaming monitor recommendations you need with the bare minimum of jargon. Whether you’re looking for the absolute best monitor on the market, the best budget option or something in between, we’ve got you covered across a large range of different gaming use-cases.

Each person’s needs are different, so we tailored our picks towards specific scenarios – the best monitors for fans of single-player games, multiplayer games, console games and so on. We also chose monitors across a range of price points, so you’ll be able to find a reasonable recommendation no matter how big or small your budget is.

The most important thing to remember is that the higher your chosen monitor’s resolution and refresh rate, the faster your PC will need to be in order to make full use of the monitor’s capabilities. For example, you have little to gain by choosing a high-end 4K 144Hz monitor without a correspondingly powerful PC that can actually generate 144 frames per second at 4K.

Budget PCs and base consoles should target the most common resolution and refresh rate combination: 1080p and 60Hz. If your computer is mid-range or better, you might consider monitors that operate at higher resolutions, higher refresh rates or both. Only powerful PCs and upgraded consoles (the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro) can handle 4K at high detail settings. Your graphics card has the biggest impact on gaming performance, so check out our guide to the best graphics cards to learn more about that side of the equation.

In a rush? Here are quick links to each recommendation!

Best gaming monitor

MSI Optix MAG271CQR: a strong 1440p and 144Hz all-rounder

Size: 27-inch | Resolution: 2560×1440 | Refresh rate: 144Hz | Features: FreeSync (48-144Hz), RGB | Panel: VA

This 27-inch MSI Optix monitor is a solid choice for most PC gamers, combining a sharp 2560×1440 resolution with a responsive 144Hz refresh rate. That’s a step up from a standard 1080p at 60Hz monitor in two dimensions, so you’ll see benefits whether you’re playing fast-paced multiplayer titles or more relaxed single-player games. The monitor also includes FreeSync, which now works on both Nvidia and AMD graphics cards.

The curved VA panel used here provides excellent contrast and good colour accuracy, but falls down a bit when it comes to viewing angles compared to IPS displays. The MAG271CQR also justifies its price with a solid height-adjustable stand, thin bezels and nice-to-have features like rear RGB lighting.

Alternative options: If image quality and wide viewing angles are more important to you than high contrast, you might also consider the Acer Predator XB271HU, which is a non-curved IPS display with G-Sync that otherwise offers largely the same specs and features. There’s also the XB271HUA, our previous best monitor pick, which uses a TN panel to hit a lower price point.

For US readers, we’ve linked to the 32-inch MAG321CQR as the 27-inch size isn’t out yet.

Best 144Hz monitor

Samsung LC24FG73: an ideal monitor for fast-paced multiplayer gaming

Size: 24-inch | Resolution: 1920×1080 | Refresh rate: 144Hz | Features: Curved, FreeSync (70-144Hz) | Panel: VA

For fast-paced multiplayer games, high refresh rate 144Hz monitors make it easier to track moving targets and hit those headshots. The Samsung LC24FG73 144Hz monitor we’ve chosen is built around a VA panel, and therefore offers better colour accuracy, viewing angles and contrast than more common TN alternatives. This model also comes with FreeSync support, helping to smooth out lower frame-rates on rigs with AMD or some Nvidia graphics cards. The price for this monitor is a little higher than the popular BenQ XL2411P, but the newer panel used here more than justifies the extra expense. While 27-inch 144Hz monitors are also available, often at a relatively low premium, we prefer 24-inch models for this category as they offer better value, are easier to fit into your peripheral vision and look less grainy at 1080p.

Alternative option: The ViewSonic XG2402 uses a TN panel, providing better input latency (4ms), a wider FreeSync range (48-144Hz) and low frame-rate compensation (LFC), which prevents tearing below the 48Hz minimum for FreeSync. Testing has also shown it works well with Nvidia graphics cards. However, the ViewSonic monitor’s viewing angles and contrast keep it from being our number one pick.

Best 4K gaming monitor

LG 27UK650-W: a surprisingly affordable 4K monitor with HDR and FreeSync

Size: 27-inch | Resolution: 3840×2160 | Refresh rate: 60Hz | Features: HDR10, FreeSync (40-60Hz) | Panel: IPS

The LG 27UK650-W is relatively modest for a 4K display at 27 inches, but within that small frame it offers quite a bit. It supports AMD’s FreeSync tech, which is perfect for smoothing out uneven frame-rates on the Xbox One, Xbox One X and gaming PCs with AMD or recent Nvidia graphics cards. The monitor is also technically HDR-capable, but its limited maximum brightness diminishes the effect considerably. However, the IPS panel still provides accurate colours and low input lag, making it a excellent choice at its less than $500/£450 price point.

Alternative options: The Predator XB321HK boasts an expansive 32-inch diagonal that makes better use of the 4K resolution, an IPS panel with excellent colour reproduction and G-Sync support to ensure that even low frame rates feel responsive. This latter item is particularly important, as all but the best graphics cards can struggle with 4K gaming at a sustained 60fps. Other nice features here include a powerful stand, a good selection of gaming modes and features and a stylish appearance with minimal bezels.

Best 240Hz monitor: Dell Alienware AW2518HF

Size: 25-inch | Resolution: 1920×1080 | Refresh rate: 240Hz | Features: FreeSync (48-240Hz) | Panel: TN

If fast-paced competitive games like Counter-Strike or Apex Legends are your jam, 240Hz monitors like this one from Dell are the undisputed performance champions. You’ll need a fast processor and graphics card to pump out enough frames but tracking moving targets becomes substantially easier. This Alienware monitor is our favourite 240Hz monitor, thanks to its unique design with thin bezels and a height-adjustable stand. The AW2518HF’s FreeSync support also works well on both Nvidia and AMD graphics cards, with a very wide FreeSync range and low frame-rate compensation (LFC) to prevent screen tearing below 48Hz. All in all, an awesome choice for competitive gamers at a very reasonable price point.

Best cheap gaming monitor: BenQ Zowie RL2455

Size: 24-inch | Resolution: 1920×1080 | Refresh rate: 60Hz | Panel: TN

The BenQ Zowie RL2455 is one of the best value monitors for budget PC gaming, and it should also suit gamers with a base model Xbox One or PlayStation 4. That’s thanks to the RL2455’s extremely low input lag, portable 24-inch span and an assortment of gaming modes and features. The black equaliser mode, which brightens darker areas of the screen, is particularly useful in shooters like Call of Duty and Fortnite, although the inclusion of several genre-specific modes ensure the monitor works well for many other games too.

Alternative option: Our second pick, the Acer KG251Q, has a higher 75Hz refresh rate and adds FreeSync support (40-75Hz), but loses many of the gaming features of the BenQ monitor. However, it is slightly cheaper.

Best ultrawide gaming monitor: Dell Alienware AW3418DW

Size: 34-inch | Resolution: 3440×1440 | Refresh rate: 120Hz | Features: G-Sync, 1900R curvature | Panel: IPS

This titanic monitor provides a suitably immersive experience, with its 34-inch span wrapping into the corners of your peripheral vision. The IPS panel used here has no obvious weaknesses, with a relatively crisp 3440×1440 resolution, excellent colour reproduction and a fluid 120Hz refresh rate with extremely low input lag for an IPS panel. The ultra-wide resolution isn’t as hard on your PC as standard 4K, but you still have the option of enabling G-Sync to improve perceived performance below 60 frames per second. Good adjustability, a wide range of gaming presets and a stylish design complete the package.

Alternative options: If you’re really looking for that dual-monitor feeling without the usual centre bezels, the Samsung CHG90 series includes a 49-inch model with a staggering 32:9 aspect ratio and 144Hz refresh rate. In our testing, it provides extreme immersion – almost like VR without the usual downsides! – but its 1080p vertical resolution and no VRR leave a little to be desired. Meanwhile, the Asus XG35VQ is similar to the Alienware model, offering better contrast and FreeSync support but a lower 100Hz refresh rate and worse colour reproduction. However, it is often cheaper than the Alienware ultra-wide.

Best 1440p gaming monitor: BenQ GW2765HT

Size: 27-inch | Resolution: 2560×1440 | Refresh rate: 60Hz | Panel: IPS

You don’t have to spend a lot to get a nice 1440p monitor these days. This 27-inch model from BenQ uses an IPS display for accurate colours, making it a good choice for creative work too. Response times are also impressive for an IPS panel, at 4ms. The GW2765HT also includes a height-adjustable stand and nice-to-have eye health features, including a low blue light mode and a flicker-free display.

Best 4K monitor for Xbox One X/PS4 Pro: BenQ EL2870U

Size: 28-inch | Resolution: 3840×2160 | Refresh rate: 60Hz | Features: HDR, FreeSync (40-60Hz) | Panel: TN

While 4K TVs pair nicely with the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro, there are also some great monitors to consider that can offer a more responsive experience, thanks to lower input latency. One example is the BenQ EL2870U, a 28-inch 4K monitor that boasts a rapid 1ms response time, FreeSync from 40 to 60Hz (which can be used on the Xbox One X) and even nominal HDR support. The EL2870U’s colour accuracy and image quality is limited by the TN panel used here and HDR is underwhelming, but the 4K resolution, FreeSync support and low price point keep this BenQ monitor in contention. The 32-inch EW3270U is also worth considering.

Best HDR gaming monitor: Acer Predator X27

Size: 27-inch | Resolution: 3840×2160 | Refresh rate: 144Hz | Features: G-Sync HDR | Panel: IPS Quantum Dot

The Predator X27 and its brother-from-another-mother, the PG27UQ ROG Swift, are by far the best gaming monitors ever made. The only problem is that they each cost more than $1000. That immense price is justified by the inclusion of seemingly every bleeding-edge monitor technology: 4K resolution, 144Hz refresh rate, G-Sync support, proper 384-zone HDR (DisplayHDR 1000), a colour-accurate Quantum Dot IPS display and more RGB lighting than you can shake a stick at.

That makes these monitors basically brilliant at everything from gaming to HDR movie watching and content creation, although for gaming you’ll need an incredibly powerful PC with one of the best graphics cards to even get close to 4K at 144Hz in most titles. In our testing with an RTX 2080, we were able to enjoy esports titles at 4K/120Hz, with modern releases like Metro Exodus at closer to 4K/60 with DLSS. Even if you turn down settings in some games, 4K at 27 inches still allows for crisp text on the web and detailed 4K videos.

Best 4K 144Hz gaming monitor: Acer Nitro XV273K

Size: 27-inch | Resolution: 3840×2160 | Refresh rate: 144Hz | Features: FreeSync, HDR | Panel: IPS Quantum Dot

The Nitro XV273K is the best 4K 144Hz monitor for most people, providing most features from the Predator X27 above at about half the price. The 4K IPS Quantum Dot display is great for high fidelity gaming and productivity, aided by a wide colour gamut and excellent colour accuracy, while the 144Hz refresh rate ensures that fast-paced games appear fluid with minimal input lag. There’s even factory colour calibration, ambient light sensor and a shading hood, making this a great choice for colour-accurate photo or video work.

The major sacrifice here is HDR; without the FALD backlight of the Predator X27, you’re left with only nominal HDR support (DisplayHDR 400, to be exact). However, that means no fan is required to cool the monitor, making it entirely silent. Acer have also included FreeSync instead of G-Sync, which now works on all modern gaming PCs and the Xbox One too and is active between 48 and 144Hz. If you’re not fussed about VRR, you can also connect two DisplayPort cables to run the monitor at 4K 144Hz with full 10-bit colour – something not possible on the Predator X27!

Essential terms for monitor buyers

Picking up your first monitor? Here are some common specs and what they actually mean.

Resolution: How many pixels are on screen, given as horizontal x vertical. 1920×1080 (1080p) and 3840×2160 (4K) are the most common resolutions for both TVs and monitors. The higher the resolution, the crisper and more detailed a game tends to look.

Refresh rate: How many times the screen updates per second, given in Hz. Standard monitors and TVs refresh at 60Hz, while gaming models may refresh anywhere from 100 to 240Hz, with 144Hz being the most common choice for a high refresh rate monitor. The higher the refresh rate, the more fluid a game will feel.

Response time: This stat typically measures how fast a pixel can turn from grey to white and then back to grey again. Most gaming monitors sport response time figures of less than 5ms, with TN panels being the fastest and IPS or VA screens being a little slower. Low response times help to eliminate distracting smears in fast-paced scenes. Note that response time is distinct from input lag, which refers to the delay between an input (like pressing a button) and seeing the effect of the input on-screen.

G-Sync/FreeSync: These are both terms that refer to adaptive sync technology, designed to eliminate ugly screen-tearing while adding less input lag than traditional v-sync. G-Sync is Nvidia’s implementation, which normally requires a physical G-Sync module inside the monitor that can drive up prices. FreeSync is the AMD alternative, which doesn’t require a special module and therefore doesn’t add much to a monitor’s price. Recently though, Nvidia announced support for FreeSync displays on GeForce graphics cards, although adaptive sync performance may vary significantly from monitor to monitor. G-Sync requires a Nvidia graphics card to work, while FreeSync requires an AMD card.

HDR: High Dynamic Range allows for greater contrast between the lightest and darkest parts of an image, as well as a wider colour gamut. While a growing number of monitors are technically HDR-capable, most can’t hit the high peak brightness figures that actually make the feature worthwhile. We recommend sticking with monitors that hit stringent standards, like HDR10, if playing games or watching films in HDR is important to you.

IPS: This sort of monitors tend to be expensive to produce, but provide better viewing angles and improved colour accuracy compared to monitors using VA or TN panels. However, some IPS panels, particularly older ones, can suffer from slower response times, making them worse for fast-paced games. Another potential issue is ‘IPS glow’, where the monitor’s backlight is visible in dark scenes.

TN: The most mature display technology, TN panels are cheap to produce and offer some of the fastest response times. However, colour accuracy and viewing angles tend to be poor, sometimes resulting in a washed out look – particularly if you’re not viewing the monitor head-on. However, modern TN panels do well to minimise these drawbacks.

VA: A type of monitor panel which tends to occupy a middle-ground between IPS and TN in many respects. These panels generally offer the best contrast, backed with good response times and colour reproduction.

Source link

Check Also

D-backs eager for Summer Camp games – MLB.com

PHOENIX — The D-backs got their Summer Camp underway Friday at both Chase Field and …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *