Russian President Vladimir Putin has rounded on US critics of his first bilateral summit with President Donald Trump.
Certain forces in the US wanted to sacrifice US-Russian ties for their “narrow party interests”, he told a meeting of Russian diplomats in Moscow.
“They are feeding millions of their people stories,” he said.
Mr Trump has been accused of taking a soft line on Russia, which denies meddling in the 2016 US election.
Days of controversy and confusion have followed Monday’s summit in Helsinki, where President Trump appeared to support Mr Putin’s contention that there was no Russian interference in the presidential election which saw Mr Trump gain power.
It followed meetings with fellow Nato leaders and a trip to the UK, which saw Mr Trump take a far harder line in public with longstanding allies than subsequently with Mr Putin.
- Calls for Trump interpreter to testify
- Your toolkit to help understand the story
- Trump’s ‘most serious mistake’
On Thursday, Mr Trump accused opponents of preferring to go to war rather than seeing good relations with Russia.
Despite the controversy, Republican voters seem to be sticking by Mr Trump.
A Reuters/Ipsos poll this week found that despite a firestorm of media criticism, Mr Trump’s Finland summit had no real impact on his overall approval ratings.
In the survey, 42% of all registered voters approved of his job performance, which is consistent with averages thus far.
Some 71% of Republicans polled approved of his response to Russia, while only 14% of Democrats were in favour.
What has Trump said?
On Tuesday, Mr Trump insisted that he had “misspoken” during the summit press conference when he appeared to side with Mr Putin over claims of Kremlin meddling in US elections.
It came as US intelligence chief Dan Coats said Russia was involved in “ongoing, pervasive efforts to undermine our democracy”.
During an interview with CBS News on Wednesday, Mr Trump said that he would consider Mr Putin personally responsible for any Russian interference.
“Just like I consider myself to be responsible for things that happen in this country,” he said. “So certainly as the leader of a country you would have to hold him responsible, yes.”
Mr Trump added that he was “very strong on the fact that we can’t have meddling” in his conversation behind closed doors in Helsinki with Russia’s leader.
US lawmakers are calling for a court demand to be issued for the notes of the US translator who accompanied Mr Trump to his two-hour meeting with Mr Putin.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is due to testify before the Senate next week about the summit.
Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leader in the House of Representatives, tried on Tuesday to stage a symbolic vote to support the findings of Russian interference, but was blocked by Republicans.
Senators Jeff Flake and Chris Coons, an Arizona Republican and a Delaware Democrat, are reportedly working on a non-binding resolution to endorse the intelligence committee’s findings.
But Texas Republican John Cornyn said the Senate should focus on “additional sanctions instead of just some messaging exercise”.
What did Trump say at the summit?
During a news conference after Monday’s summit, Mr Trump was asked about alleged Russian meddling in the US election.
According to a transcript posted by the White House, he said: “My people came to me… they said they think it’s Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be.”
The summit comments sparked a barrage of criticism from lawmakers across the political spectrum, with many calling on him to correct himself.
On Tuesday, Mr Trump said he had reviewed the transcript and realised he needed to clarify.
“The sentence should have been: ‘I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t’ or ‘why it wouldn’t be Russia’. Sort of a double negative.”
Mr Trump said that the interference had had no impact on the election, in which he defeated Hillary Clinton.
However, he did not respond when reporters asked him if he would condemn Mr Putin.
Trump Putin: Russian leader attacks US critics of summit